E-Waste Export Bill (aka Responsible Electronics Recycling Act of 2011) announced this week!!!

If you’ve seen our film, The Story of Electronics or read the e-waste section of The Story of Stuff book, you know that we’re pretty concerned about what happens to our electronic gadgets when we throw them out. In the U.S. alone, we produce over 3 million tons of e-waste a year. And other countries are catching up quickly. Where does all this stuff go?

Unfortunately, most e-waste still goes into the trash, which means our laptops, cell phones and game devices end up in landfills and incinerators; usually in Asia or Africa.

We churn through electronic gadgets at an ever accelerating rate, so the overseas export of e-waste is a huge problem. We need to solve our waste problems, not export them.

And guess what? The normally glacial-paced U.S. Congress has taken a step in the right direction! Let’s cheer them on!

Earlier this week – on June 22nd, a bill was introduced in the US House of Representatives called the Responsible Electronics Recycling Act of 2011. This bill will stop sham U.S. “recyclers” from dumping electronic waste on developing countries and will promote much needed recycling jobs in the U.S. where unemployment rates are soaring.

Barbara Kyle, National Coordinator of the Electronics TakeBack Coalition, an excellent coalition which has been working on this issue for years, said “This is the most important step our federal government can take to solve the e-waste problem – to close the door on e-waste dumping on developing countries.”

Help make this bill into law!

If you live in the U.S., call your representative and ask him or her to co-sponsor or support the Responsible Electronics Recycling Act (H.R. 2284). You can look up your Representative’s phone number, or call the Congressional switchboard: 1-202-224-3121. (Recommendation: Enter your Congressperson’s phone number in your phone so you can call easily and often – remember, these people work for us so they need to hear from us – not just from professional lobbyists!)

If you live outside the U.S., please write or call the U.S. Embassy in your country asking the Obama Administration to support the bill for the Responsible Electronics Recycling Act as an important step in stopping waste exports from the U.S. Imagine their surprise to know that people all over the world know about – and support – this new bill!

If you live outside the U.S. and want to stop other waste exports and imports, ask your own government to uphold the Basel Convention including the Basel Ban, an international treaty which bans the export of hazardous wastes from OECD countries to non-OECD ones. You can learn more about the Basel Convention and check if your country has ratified the Convention and the Ban.

Wherever you live, make your electronics last as long as possible. Take care of them. Repair them. Share them. Resist the upgrade. Use an old one proudly! And when you simply must discard some electronic gadget, make sure it is being safely recycled. In the U.S., Canada and the UK, look for recyclers with an e-Steward certification which means they promise not to export e-waste to developing countries. In other countries, urge electronics recyclers to join e-stewards and recycle responsibly. Because it just isn’t right to dump our toxic contaminated stuff on other countries.


©2011 Basel Action Network (BAN)

posted by Christina M. Samala
June 24, 2011
share this post:
tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
  • Nicole

    I came across this link which talks mainly about planned obsolescence but also has a substantial section on our E waste ending up in Ghana.

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5f7_1308758536

  • Adriana Ortegon

    Planned obsolescence has been around for many years and I disagree with the movie that it is secret. It is right here in front of our eyes. It is hard to “do the right thing” and hold on to your old laptop or cell phone when their acceptable lifespan is extremely short and is cheaper to buy a new one than to fix the broken one. I still try to use my old broken laptop, even when I have to wait a couple of hours for it to charge with a modified home-made power cord. However, most of the time it is unpractical to spend 15-20 min setting up the improvised charging device to get only one hour of work from it. Nonetheless, I still go get my precious Tiramisu recepie from it.

  • Jon

    This video, “Story of Electronics” is as informative as a reductive soundbite. There is so much neglected information and false assumptions in this video that the truth of the big picture gets buried in the rubble of its over blown misinformation
    I was a product designer now about to practice architecture and I deeply care about the environment. If you guys really cared about the environment and the welfare of the common people in regards to consumer electronics and our ecosystem then why not support Cradle to Cradle Design.
    It is the most holistic approach to design because it list the most non-toxic and truly green(third party verified) materials we have today that is sustainable and economical in the hands of designers and companies.
    One of the issues companies face today is that Research and Development is a huge investment sinks. But only good old fashion hard work in design and development can prevent toxic products. It takes years and millions of dollars to design a product and no excessive amount of money can speed up creative work, in fact it can slow it down (TED Talk Dan Pink). Bad products come out because it hasn’t had time to incubate in fact. I’ve had many colleagues rushed by the corporate higher ups to rush production just for the product to shortly suffer a recall and the designer to get blamed.
    Creatives today are forced to try and perform at a speed of an assembly line which spawns an exponential amount of crap products. Good to Great ideas need time to mature like a baby in a womb.
    Also, this video paints a bad picture of Moore’s Law. This is like saying I hate rulers or graduated cylinders. Moore’s Law is a system of measure with its limit being the laws of quantum mechanics. And because of this unit of measure we are able to make smaller useful electronics. Can you imagine if everyone in America had a personal computer like in the 50′s the size of a suburban garage and the massive amount of material and carbon footprint it will have?
    I’m not advocating not recycling that’s why I brought up cradle to cradle design and I do appreciate the fact that the message of wasteful consumption is negative but please don’t be a bull in a china shop and don’t be overly simplistic. Simple = Good Simplistic = Bad Complex = Good Complicated = Bad

  • Occam’s Beard

    What Jon said.

    I’m a professor of chemistry, and seriously, Annie, you should be ashamed of yourself for the gross misrepresentations and calumnies you’re promulgating.

    For one example, you tee off on halogenated flame retardants. You are aware, I trust, that they are legally required in many products? Their purpose is to save the lives of those – including children – who might otherwise be burned to death by fires starting in electrical equipment.

    So your choices are:

    1. Change the law, eliminate flame retardants, and let some number of people burn to death in fires, and

    2. Live with flame retardants, which don’t cause problems in the first place, and which minimize the fire risk of electrical equipment.

    Tradeoffs, Annie. It’s what grownups have to do all the time.

  • http://www.greensciencepolicy.org Arlene Blum

    Dear Professor of Chemistry,

    Annie has it right.

    You might want to look into the toxicology and epidemology of halogenated flame retardants a little more closely.

    The peer reviewed science showing accumulation and harm of these chemicals in all of us is extensive, indeed it is overwhelming. You can read the 100 plus paper each year at the Brominated Flame Retardant meetings http://www.bfr2011.org/ and the many hundreds at the Dioxin meetings, http://www.dioxin2011.org/

    Please check out http://www.greensciencepolicy.org and you will learn that in many cases the flame retardants do not provide a fire benefit. Products still burn and give off more toxic gases with the retardants present.

    Selling these chemicals is highly profitable and the major support for their use comes from Citizens for Fire Safety and other chemical industry front groups I cannot help wondering, given your degree of misinformation, what your connection to the bromine producers might be.

    Arlene Blum, PhD
    Visiting Scholar in Chemistry
    University of California, Berkeley,

  • n. m.

    Hiya, I am really glad I have found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and net and this is really annoying. A good web site with interesting content, this is what I need. Thanks for keeping this web-site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Cant find it.